Mind Control (Bewusstseinskontrolle) : topic:Wissenschaftliche Beitraege (englisch)

The Science Behind Mind Control

Omega — 2009-07-11T15:22:00Z

The Science Behind Mind Control

Informant: CGamba

http://mindcontrol.twoday.net/search?q=Delgado

Hidden Persuasion or Junk Science?

Omega — 2007-09-10T06:44:00Z

http://groups.google.de/group/archive_news/browse_thread/thread/6e6b9252d79d0903?hl=en

http://mindcontrol.twoday.net/search?q=neuroscience

Electronic Mind Control

Omega — 2005-04-27T13:24:05Z

http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495;article=82420;show_parent=1

Microwaves and Behavior

Omega — 2005-04-24T06:24:24Z

http://www.raven1.net/v2success.htm

Informant: Mark Marks

Conversations With Researchers on Mind Control

Omega — 2005-04-12T14:31:32Z

I have been going over a lot of information about the current techs on mind control this link has been beneficial I felt compelled to share it with this group.

http://www.freezone.org/mc/e_conv01.htm

Bobby Bravenet

Microwave Hearing - Transmissions by Microphones

Omega — 2005-04-05T20:51:12Z

Review of Literature Related to Recording Microwave Hearing Transmissions by Microphones, and Consideration of Recordings by an Affiant to Remote Harassment

John J. McMurtrey, M. S., 6 Nov. 2004
http://www.slavery.org.uk/RecordingMicrowaveHearingEffects.doc

Informant: why

BIBLIOGRAPHY ON THE PSYCHOACTIVITY OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS

Omega — 2005-01-07T15:22:49Z

"At http://www.vxm.com/bib.doc.html is a large 1986 "Bibliography on the psychoactivity of electromagnetic fields" by two of the well known names in the field, Robert Beck and Eldon Byrd. This bibliography documents extensive scientific experimentation in the two decades before it."

-quote from Lobster magazine, Winter 2004.

In the same issue, John Allman's USA speech on "Mind-influencing technology" is printed, and the magazine encloses a useful leaflet put out by Christians Against Mental Slavery http://www.BanMindWeapons.com

http://www.lobster-magazine.co.uk
Lobster appears twice a year.
Annual subscriptions cost
GBP6.00 in UK,
GBP8.00 in Europe,
GBP9.00 rest of world.

Lyn Milnes

MODERN TORTURE AND CONTROL MECHANISMS ELIMINATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND PRIVACY

Omega — 2004-12-06T17:19:41Z

MICROWAVE MIND CONTROL: MODERN TORTURE AND CONTROL MECHANISMS ELIMINATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND PRIVACY

http://www.raven1.net/kilde1.htm
http://www.google.de/search?hl=de&q=Rauni+Kilde&btnG=Suche&meta=

Robert Pavlita

Omega — 2004-08-22T17:01:50Z

http://www.ssivanic.hr/~gogo/0033.htm

The Geometry of Robert Pavlita
http://www.keelynet.com/interact/archive/00001137.htm
http://www.midcoast.com/~michael1/

Soviet and Czechoslovakian Parapsychological Research

Omega — 2004-08-22T16:44:28Z

Note: the references to diagrams have been included, but the photocopies provided are illegible, and are therefore not included in this document.

Extract from 'Soviet and Czechoslovakian Parapsychological Research'

Authors: Mr Louis F. Maire III

Major J. D. LaMothe, MSC

DST-18105-387-75

September 1975

Part II

PSYCHOTRONIC GENERATOR RESEARCH

Psychotronic generators (also called Pavlita generators after the inventor) are small devices said to be capable of drawing biological energy from humans: the energy is accumulated and stored for future use. Once charged with human energy, the generators can do some of the things a psychic subject can do, but, according too the inventor, Robert Pavlita, can be charged by individuals possessing no psychic ability.

The concept of man as a source of unusual energy dates back to at least as far as ancient Chinese and Hindu teachings, in which it was called 'vital energy' or 'prana' Between the 18th and 20th centuries it was called various things (animal magnetism, odic force, motor force, n-rays, etheric force, etc.) by rediscoverers of its existence. In contemporary Soviet and Czechoslovakian parapsychology this energy is called bioplasmic or psychotronic energy. The Czechoslovakian rediscovery of biological energy is credited to Robert Pavlita, an inventor and businessman from Prague who began work on his devices over thirty years ago.

Some representative examples of Pavlita generators are shown in figures 3 through 7. No details of their construction have ever been made available to Western observers, possibly because Pavlita eventually plans to seek foreign patents. It has been reported, however, that the devices are fabricated from various metals (steel, bronze, copper, iron, gold) and that their effects are a result of their form.

Pavlita's generators can be charged by direct contact (e.g., rubbing or touching to the temporal region of the head) or by visually directing mental concentration from them at a distance. The nature of the energy stored is still not understood, but over the years a number of observations about it effects have been reported. It can be reflected, refracted, polarized, and combined with other forms of energy. It creates effects similar to magnetism, heat, electricity, and luminous radiation, but is itself none of these. The energy apparently can be conducted by paper, wood, silk, and other substances normally considered to be good insulators. The devices have been tested by commissions of experts from the Czechoslovakian Academy of Sciences and the University of Hradec Kralove in Prague. Static electricity, air currents, temperature changes, and magnetism, were eliminated as possible explanations for the observed effects. In addition, the energy exerted its effect through glass, water, wood, cardboard, or any type of metal and was not diminished.

According to both Soviet and Czech researchers, one major advantage of studying psychotronic generators is the reproducibility of their effects; in addition, they can be activated by nearly anyone, with or without any special psychic abilities. The devices may have other practical applications not related to parapsychology. The Czechs claim that irradiation of seeds with the energy enhances plant growth, and that industrial pollutants have been precipitated out of water by its action (Figure 7). These claims may be open to question, since in 1972, Zdenek Kejdak, head of the Psychotronic Research Section of the Czechoslovakian Society for Science and Technology, termed the experiments with plants and water 'ineffective'.

A recent newspaper article, quoting Pavlita, reported that his generators could serve as weapons; no further details were given. No information is available on Czech efforts to develop psychotronic weapons, but Pavlita has stated that some of forms of his devices can exert both favourable and unfavourable effects on living organisms, including man. In experiments with snails exposed to the energy from a generator, a state similar to hibernation resulted. When flies were placed in the gap of a circular generator they died instantly. In another test, Pavlita aimed a generator at his daughter's head from a distance of several yards. Her electroencephalogram (EEG) changed, she became dizzy, and her equilibrium was disrupted.

In their present form and size, Pavlita's device could probably exert an effect on humans at only relatively short range. It is possible that their size could be enlarged or their energy amplified, thereby extending their range. If the Czech claims for these devices are valid, biological energy might be an effective antipersonnel weapon. It would be difficult to defend against, since it apparently penetrates the most common forms of insulation and its reported effects (changes in brain wave characteristics, disturbance of equilibrium, dizziness) could result in personality changes or physical discomfort which might alter combat effectiveness.

Soviet or Czech perfection of psychotronic weapons would pose a severe threat to enemy military, embassy, or security functions. The emitted energy would be silent and difficult to detect electronically (although the Soviets claim to have developed effective biological energy sensors) and the only power source required would be the human operator.

Source: http://www.rvscience.com/crystal/dst.htm (excerpt)

Effects of low power microwaves on the local cerebral blood flow of conscious rats

Omega — 2004-08-11T13:26:21Z

http://omega.twoday.net/stories/299953/

Possible Deleterious Effects of Physiologically Significant Radiation Pressure Exposures

Omega — 2004-05-24T08:17:33Z

http://omega.twoday.net/stories/173073/

Propaganda Techniques

Omega — 2004-04-27T21:01:05Z

Propagandists use a variety of propaganda techniques to influence opinions and to avoid the truth. Often these techniques rely on some element of censorship or manipulation, either omitting significant information or distorting it. They are indistinguishable except in degree from the persuasion techniques employed in social, religious and commercial affairs. Recently persuasion technology has come into common use, in all styles from digital image alteration to persuasive presentation and persistent telemarketing based on repetition, making these techniques impossible to avoid.

http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Propaganda_techniques

War propaganda is used to confuse and demoralize enemies and also to influence public opinions in friendly countries. Often, a nation at war uses propaganda to control its own citizens. According to British scholar F.M. Cornford, "Propaganda is that branch of the art of lying which consists in very nearly deceiving your friends without quite deceiving your enemies."

Between states it may involve lying about the potential for new weapons, e.g. artificial intelligence like the smart bomb, which can either impress opponents into dealing, or, e.g. the molecular assembler or atom bomb, convince them that something which is feasible is in fact not, to give the disinforming party a headstart in researching the weapon or technology that is pre-requisite to it.

Propaganda versus democracy is frequently debated in political science - there is a natural tension between government, which must keep secrets sometimes, and the right of the governed to know what is going on and consent.

To obtain consent for war with minimal effort, many standard techniques have been employed:

* Pro-technology propaganda to excuse investment in a military-industrial complex or persuasion technology to further simplify confusing the public.

* Terrorism as propaganda to excuse invasive and confiscatory measures due to the "constant threat" - which may in fact be manufactured or funded by one's own government but serve as an excuse for foreign wars or domestic terror, e.g. Burning the Reichstag.

* Cooked intelligence selectively shared to increase public fear or willingness to support a war, e.g. War on Iraq.

During a war, almost any unusual event can be exploited for positive publicity to "prove" how "bad" the enemy is, or how "uncertain" the situation was or is in the country (should one's own troops do something wrong) - thus the troops are brave and good.

After a war, "feel good" stories are employed to convince voters that they did the right thing, and should support future wars, and the leaders that lead them.

http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=War_propaganda

The birth of the military-industrial complex was described on January 17, 1961, by WWII Supreme Commander of Allied Forces in Europe and two term USA President Dwight David Eisenhower in his farewell address to the nation in what is called his Military Industrial Complex Speech:

"In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the militaryindustrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

"We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together."

The military-industrial complex is generally defined as a "coalition consisting of the military and industrialists who profit by manufacturing arms and selling them to the government."

Eisenhower related, however, that until World War II, the United States did not have an armaments industry. Even though "American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well," the United States could "no longer risk emergency improvisation" of the country's national defense.[1]

The United States, he continues, had been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. At that time, the U.S. was annually spending more on military security "than the net income of all United States corporations." This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry, he said, was "new in the American experience" and that there was an imperative need for this development.[2]

http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Military-industrial_complex

War

From Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

War is conflict involving the use of arms and physical force between nations, countries, or other large-scale armed groups. Warfare is the conduct of war.

Typically, warfare is mortal and lives of combatants are deliberately taken by enemy forces and the continued existence of a losing group as an entity is in doubt. In view of this, rules for the conduct of war are unenforceable during active conflict. A person faced with death, or an organisation faced with extinction, both have little incentive to obey rules that contribute to that result. If they can survive by breaking the rules they are likely to do so, and some would argue justifably.

Sometimes a distinction is made between a conflict and the formal declaration of a state of war. Given this distinction the term "war" is sometimes considered restricted to those conflicts where one or both belligerants have made a formal declaration.

Wars have been fought to control natural resources, for religious or cultural reasons, over political balances of power, legitimacy of particular laws, to settle economic and territorial disputes, and many other issues. The roots of any war are very complex - there is usually more than one issue involved.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War

Libertarians: Beyond 'do no harm'
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/message/4005

Message from Terry Liberty Parker (excerpt)

LOW-POWER MICROWAVE TESTING CARRIED OUT BY NASA

Omega — 2004-04-23T21:50:04Z

Effects of low power microwaves on the local cerebral blood
flow of conscious rats

The report below was retrieved from NASA's on-line technical document archive. The information itself dates from the 1980s and details testing which was carried out using low-power microwave pulses on rats. The testing was intended to lead to a form of psychological warfare.

Note: I have removed non-relevant headers from the report.

TITLE: Effects of low power microwaves on the local cerebral blood flow of conscious rats

Document ID: 19810004209 N (81N12720) File Series: NASA Technical Reports

Report Number: AD-A090426

Authors: Oscar, K. J. (Army Mobility Equipment Command)

Published: Jun 01, 1980

Corporate Source: Army Mobility Equipment Command (Fort Belvoir, VA, United States)

Pages: 10

Contract Number: None

NASA Subject Category: LIFE SCIENCES (GENERAL)

Abstract:

A decoy and deception concept presently being considered is to remotely create the perception of noise in the heads of personnel by exposing them to low power, pulsed microwaves. When people are illuminated with properly modulated low power microwaves the sensation is reported as a buzzing, clicking, or hissing which seems to originate (regardless of the person's position in the field) within or just behind the head. The phenomena occurs at average power densities as low as microwatts per square centimeter with carrier frequencies from 0.4 to 3.0 GHz. By proper choice of pulse characteristics, intelligible speech may be created. Before this technique may be extended and used for military applications, an understanding of the basic principles must be developed. Such an understanding is not only required to optimize the use of the concept for camouflage, decoy and deception operations but is required to properly assess safety factors of such microwave exposure.

Major Subject Terms: AUDITORY PERCEPTION - BRAIN CIRCULATION - DECEPTION - MICROWAVES - PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS - RADIATION EFFECTS

Minor Subject Terms: BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS - HEMODYNAMICS - MILITARY TECHNOLOGY - RADIATION DOSAGE - SOUND LOCALIZATION

Language Note: English

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/lowpower.html

Informant: Gotemf

Links:

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/human.html
http://tinyurl.com/22d4x
http://www.raven1.net/v2s-nasa.htm
http://www.raven1.net/p43.htm
http://www.adacomp.net/~mcherney/rats.htm
http://www.datafilter.com/mc/c_controlOfChoiceAbstract.html
http://tinyurl.com/2db6l
http://educate-yourself.org/mc/listofmcsymptoms05jun03.shtml
http://www.mindjustice.org/camp01.htm
http://www.mindjustice.org/symptoms.htm
http://www.datafilter.com/mc/remoteBehavioralInfluence.html
http://www.talkaboutgovernment.com/group/alt.politics.org.covert/messages/4140.html
http://members.aol.com/phikent/orbit/new174.htm
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/nancy.htm

Targeting the Human with Directed Energy Weapons

Omega — 2004-04-23T16:56:12Z

Dr. Reinhard Munzert

New arms threaten and destroy lives in strange ways. Directed energy weapons are among the high-tech arms of the century. They hurt and kill with electromagnetic power. Microwave weapons can be aimed at computers, electronical devices and persons. They have strong physical and psychological effects and can be used for military and terrorist activities. These weapons are also part of crimes (in Europe) that almost nobody knows except the victims and the offenders. Until now they make the perfect crime possible. No doubt, these weapons have a terrible future.

see further under:

http://tinyurl.com/ypm3z