http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/commentary.asp?record_id=430

[jcm notes 10 26 06......suggestion to use on US citizens re crowd control before military use.....9 06 ]

So far, ISRAEL has't used LASER & MIND CONTROL weapons US secretly used in Iraq (audio & video)

On May 7th, I listened to a 3 hour interview on the Coast to Coast radio program http://www.coasttocoastam.com/shows/2006/05/07.html about Chemtrails and Mind Control weapons which our troops had secretly used in Iraq and about the horrible consequences it brought to civilians AND TO OUR OWN TROOPS!

Chances are, most find this hard to believe, as it was for me, until I saw the "Defense Tech" article below. It was then, that I decided to condense those 3 hours of the interview into 30 minutes of excerpts which I provide below.

Another link led me to a video clip which revealed that our troops had also used Laser weapons and the deadly and horrifying reprecations it brought to many Iraqi civilians.

YOU WILL BE DISMAYED AT WHAT YOU'LL HEAR AND VIEW!

This seems to be a preferred weapon of choice from our civilian command for it leaves buildings and property intact, much like neutron bombs would have done, compared to the destruction atom bombs produce.

Given the horrible devastation that is taking place in Lebanon, I wondered how come the Israelis have not used this technology instead of bombs? And, believe me, they MUST have it and, probably, have worked in its development along with the US.

I thought of two possible answers to my questions:

1. Israel places the highest priority and value on their own soldiers. They probably did not want to expose them to the harm endured by our soldiers who had to deploy such miind control weapons (as you will learn in the audio clips). Now, compared this to the lack of concern for our troops which our current civilian command has repeatedly demonstrated.

2. The US has not given Israel permission to use them, reserving them for whenever they have "bigger fish" to literally fry!...(Syria, Iran, China???).

Jack


Mind Weapons Writing for Defense Tech, David Hambling runs down some of the latest plasma and electromagnetic weapons that the US military is developing to affect the brain and nervous system of its adversaries. They include the Active Denial System which uses high-frequency radiation for crowd control and the Pulsed Energy Projectile which stuns or disables targets with plasma balls and may be able to create synthetic images. Read more here. or this link: http://www.defensetech.org/archives/002152.html


MIND CONTROL WEAPONS IN IRAQ

Excerpts from the May 7th Coast to Coast program on Mind Control weapons

1) http://PlayAudio-234.com/play.asp?m=330892&f=HWIDWD&ps=13&p=1 (9 min)

2) http://PlayAudio-234.com/play.asp?m=330895&f=SPYVPQ&ps=13&p=1 (9 min)

3) http://PlayAudio-234.com/play.asp?m=330899&f=VXYJYV&ps=13&p=1 (9 min)

As an added bonus, I included a short segment from this radio interview which will astonish you:

STUNNING DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DOCUMENTATION ABOUT THE TIMING OF CHENEY'S KNOWLEDGE OF IRAQ'S DMDs

http://PlayAudio-234.com/play.asp?m=330901&f=BNEFDM&ps=13&p=1 (3 min)


VIDEO ON THE USE OF LASER WEAPONS IN IRAQ

I should warn you... as you scroll down to get to this video, you will come across links to other video clips that show the horrors of the Iraq war. I viewed one, and one was enough for me. So, if you decide to view any of them, be prepared to be horrified.

For the video on laser weapons, scroll down to the 2nd video screen that appears on the web page which has the heading "Iraq - laser weapons documentary"

http://www.willthomas.net/Video-Store/index.htm


Jack Topel

Actually this is noting new,a good way to cull useless eaters under the guise of heat related deaths.

US using 'dangerous new form of weapon' From Brett Wagner, president of the California Center for Strategic Studies:

A couple of weeks ago I sent you an urgent email titled "The Most Shocking Thing I Have Ever Seen."

Since then, the California Center for Strategic Studies (CCSS) has been gathering additional evidence that the U.S. government has deployed a very dangerous new form of weapon in Iraq, apparently without congressional approval.

We have now set up an online petition calling on the U.S. Congress to oppose the development and deployment of the "pain ray" and the "death ray":

http://www.PetitionOnline.com/DeathRay/petition.html

The petition also serves as a rough draft for prospective legislation.

Enclosed at the bottom of this email is an op-ed I've written which is going out all across the country next week. It will fill you in on most of the details. Thanks to our efforts, this story is probably going to be VERY BIG very soon.

Over the past week I've placed a number of phone calls to my usual contacts on Capitol Hill, and several key congressional staff members are interested in setting up a joint meeting for me to brief them on these issues.

(We've worked with many of these same staffers on previous legislation.)

We believe there is a very good chance we can introduce legislation right after the August recess, but it's very important that we get the ball rolling SOON.

A few on the Democratic side of the aisle also believe this could become a very big issue in the November elections, for all the obvious reasons: mismanagement of the war in Iraq, a dangerous new precedent, etc.

(That's not to say this should be a "political issue" ­ but the reality is, in Washington everything is political to some extent.)

Opportunities like this to make a real difference in the course of Human Events are the primary reason why we launched our think tank 7 years ago. Since we are a small tightly-run organization, we rely almost totally on contributions from regular people like you ­ that means we do not have any funds set aside to pay for this trip to Washington.

Please consider making a contribution today, so that I can begin making all the necessary travel preparations to go to Washington (booking a flight, lodging, etc.) as soon as possible.

Please don't wait for someone else to help us ­ we need you!

You can make a tax-deductible online contribution to help out with our efforts by clicking on:
http://www.thecaliforniacenter.org/contribute.php

Or by mailing your tax-deductible contribution to:

The California Center for Strategic Studies
4882 McGrath St., Suite 230 Ventura, CA 93003


"From the 'pain ray' to the 'death ray': Have direct energy weapons already been deployed by U.S. forces in Iraq?"

By Brett Wagner

Nothing in my training or experience as a national security specialist prepared me for what I witnessed last month when viewing a newly released documentary news video concerning an extremely controversial new generation of U.S. weaponry which may have already been secretly deployed in Iraq. This sort of thing is not for the faint of heart.

For the past few years the U.S. military has been developing new technology based on "directed energy" yielding two new types of weapons.

The first, "Active Denial System," has been nicknamed the "pain ray" -- and with good reason. It fires out millimeter waves -- a sort of cousin of microwaves, in the 95 GHz range. The invisible beams penetrate just 1/64th of an inch beneath the skin, directly affecting the nerve endings, and a 2-second burst can heat the skin to 130 degrees. Charles Heal, a widely recognized authority on nonlethal weapons who has dubbed the ray the "Holy Grail of crowd control," likened it to having a hot iron pressed against the skin.

Deploying the pain ray would be a clear violation of international law, which prohibits weapons whose primary intention is to inflict pain. Earlier this year, a U.S. military commander in Iraq requested that, despite the ban, the weapon be deployed immediately. But following the efforts of our organization and others opposing that request, Washington has indefinitely delayed any deployment pending further testing and analysis.

The second form of directed energy weaponry fires out microwaves, a form of energy well known for its use in modern kitchen appliances. I have nicknamed this weapon the "death ray" -- and with good reason. Exposing mammals to microwaves is known to make them explode.

The documentary news video in question, which was released online recently (16 May 2006) by a major Italian news service, examines evidence that the U.S. military has deployed ­ dating back to the 2003 battle for Baghdad Airport ­ a new generation of weaponry likely based on firing microwaves. Viewer discretion is advised: even as a former professor for the U.S. Naval War College, this goes way beyond my comfort zone

Judging from the reported effects of the weaponry, it likely includes "speed of light" technology defying the generic term "laser" and it is my professional opinion that it also likely includes the use of microwaves, judging from the descriptions of bodies that seem to have inexplicably exploded.

However, I cannot imagine the scientific explanation for the cadavers that reportedly shrunk to the size of approximately one-meter in length after being exposed to some sort of ray (the cause of death) and then inadvertently struck by bullets. Neither do I have an explanation for what one eyewitness describes as a bus transformed "like a cloth, like a wet cloth" and shrunk to the size of a Volkswagen. To me, it sounds like a very intense form of microwaves.

The statements by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and General Myers excerpted from a 2003 archived press conference are especially revealing:

JOURNALIST: Mr. Secretary, can I ask you a question about some of the technology that you're developing to fight the war on terrorists, specifically directed energy and high-powered microwave technology? When do you envision that you can weaponize that type of technology?

DONALD RUMSFELD (appearing noticeably uncomfortable with the question): In the normal order of things, when you invest in research and development and begin a developmental project, you don't have any intention or expectations that one would use it. On the other hand, the real world intervenes from time to time, and you reach in there and take something out that is still in a developmental stage, and you might use it.

JOURNALIST: But you sound like you're willing to experiment with it.

GENERAL MYERS: Yeah, I think that's the point. And I think we have from the beginning of this conflictŠ I think General Franks [commander of U.S. forces in Iraq] has been very open to looking at new things, if there are new things available, and has been willing to put them into the fight, even before they've been fully wrung outŠ And we will continue to do that.

Also noteworthy was the inclusion of footage, albeit very brief, near the end of the documentary of the "pain ray" being tested on a person identified as an American soldier. The person exposed to the ray obviously experienced excruciating pain before ducking quickly out of the line of fire.

The closing remarks in the documentary by highly-respected military analyst William Arkin echo my widely-publicized concerns regarding the implications of the pain ray for use in crowd control in the U.S. ­ and the potential threat to our basic civil liberties, such as our First Amendment rights of peaceable assembly and to petition the government for a redress of our grievances (not to mention undermining the norms expressed by Sixth Amendment prohibitions against cruel and unusual punishment).

These types of weapons pose a dire threat to the world as we know it and their deployment must be prevented at all cost. At the very least, they could ignite a new global arms race, which in turn would lead to increasing global instability or worse.

We simply must not allow this "Brave New World" to enter our own.


Brett Wagner is president of the California Center for Strategic Studies http://www.TheCaliforniaCenter.org .

Additional research was provided by CCSS analysts Jacob Shepard and Clay Fordahl.

(The video cited can be viewed in English, Italian or Arabic by clicking on http://www.rainews24.it/ran24/inchieste/guerre_stellari_iraq.asp )


The California Center for Strategic Studies is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) tax exempt educational institute as recognized by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, and is incorporated in the State of California.

http://uk.oneworld.net/article/view/136518/1/5795


Informant: mjb1905

UPDATE ON CONGRESSIONAL MEETINGS

Meetings were scheduled in 22 congressional offices in Washington D.C. during the week of June 12, 2006. Meetings were also scheduled in 15 offices last year during the week of October 3, 2005. A total of more than 50 offices responded to our letters about the misuse of electronic weapons and related technology. Congress was asked to start an investigation and pass new laws. The report was titled “Please consider sponsoring proposed legislation about aircraft safety, electronic weapons, human experiments, and other national security issues.” The 12 page report will be posted in the near future. Legislative assistants that met with us in October 2005 were told that we would write our own version of laws to be submitted in 2006. Some of the staff members that we met for the second time remembered the information in the October 2005 report that was titled “Electronic weapons could endanger national security.” The purpose of this report was to encourage Congress to start talking openly about electronic weapons.

The following topics were of interest to legislative assistants in June 2006. At least five staff members expressed an interest in starting an investigation. We can rely on two of those offices to help us, and maybe all five. One person will talk with staff members in five other offices to discuss the best way to proceed. This important meeting was originally scheduled by Dr. Le Roy Gillam. An assistant said that it was reasonable to review the constitutionality of two laws, and possibly repeal the two laws that authorize government employees to test chemical agents, biological agents, or electronic equipment on a civilian population. He also wanted evidence of human testing. One topic of interest was related to the “Securing Aircraft Cockpits Against Lasers Act of 2005,” which was unanimously passed by Congress. The legislative assistant asked us to write a narrow definition describing the electronic technology that could have a more serious impact on aircraft.

The new legislation will expand the list of electronic devices or weapons that are prohibited from being pointed at aircraft (and passengers). One staff member was interested in receiving more information about this sentence: “Congressional oversight and investigations in the past moved secret covert operations for research and development of many technologies and weapons into the laboratories of private contractors.” Hearings are being scheduled to discuss new regulations on Tasers and other common electronic weapons, which was the first topic in our October 2005 report. There was more positive feedback and suggestions from legislative assistants about how we should proceed.

WRITING LETTERS AND LEGISLATION

Thanks to many volunteers who wrote and edited proposals, or made suggestions for the legislation presentation during the last year. Many of our organizers or group leaders agree that to convince government officials, friends, or family about the misuse of electronic weapons, it is better to present verifiable evidence, such as mainstream news stories, government reports, patent numbers, laws about electronic weapons that have been passed already, etc. It is difficult to convince others about the misuse of technology by using personal stories.

Our group went to a congressional meeting with a TI. After telling a personal story about electronic targeting, the TI noticed the disbelief in the facial expression of the legislative assistant. A better way to convey our message is by writing one page letters, instead of making explanations by phone or in person.

Several TI’s have volunteered to help improve or edit letters, or you may choose to use the action committee letters to Congress when they are written in the near future.

SATURDAY NIGHT CONFERENCE CALL

The congressional meetings and rally will be discussed on the Saturday night conference call. Most of your questions will be answered at that time. However, the six individuals (Ted Gunderson, Mary Ann Stratton, Robert Duncan, Krissi Stull, and Jim McCue) who attended the congressional meetings agreed not to discuss the names or offices of the legislative assistants that met with us.

It is important that the action committee, writers, and editors be allowed to pursue these new congressional leads confidentially in the way that is determined to help our cause the most. The 12 page proposed legislation will be posted on http://www.freedomfchs.com in the near future. The report was written to generate interest in Congress to start an investigation and pass legislation about the misuse of electronic weapons. Keep in mind that presenting most of the verifiable evidence happens during the investigation. Your suggestions on how to proceed are welcome during the conference call and after you have had an opportunity to read the proposed legislation. Please forward this information to your friends.

Thanks,

Derrick
513-531-8873
dcr618@msn.com

http://tinyurl.com/zdw4n

--------

EFFECTS OF GHz RADIATION ON THE HUMAN NERVOUS SYSTEM: Recent developments in the technology of political control

by Harian E. Girard

Philadelphia, PA (USA)

for the

NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Coherent and Emergent Phenomena in Biomolecular Systems.

The University of Arizona, Jan. 1991

http://www.naicr.org/aps/Hgirardmicrowaveauditory.txt



http://tinyurl.com/ykg5bf