The tactics used to create undue psychological and social influence, often by means involving anxiety and stress, fall into seven main categories.

TACTIC 1. Increase suggestibility and "soften up" the individual through specific hypnotic or other suggestibility-increasing techniques such as:Extended audio, visual, verbal, or tactile fixation drills,Excessive exact repetition of routine activities, Sleep restriction, and/or Nutritional restriction.

TACTIC 2. Establish control over the person's social environment, time and sources of social support by a system of often-excessive rewards and punishments. Social isolation is promoted. Contact with family and friends is abridged, as is contact with persons who do not share group-approved attitudes. Economic and other dependence on the group is fostered.

TACTIC 3. Prohibit disconfirming information and non supporting opinions in group communication. Rules exist about permissible topics to discuss with outsiders. Communication is highly controlled. An "in-group" language is usually constructed.

TACTIC 4. Make the person re-evaluate the most central aspects of his or her experience of self and prior conduct in negative ways. Efforts are designed to destabilize and undermine the subject's basic consciousness, reality awareness, world view, emotional control and defense mechanisms. The subject is guided to reinterpret his or her life's history and adopt a new version of causality.

TACTIC 5. Create a sense of powerlessness by subjecting the person to intense and frequent actions and situations which undermine the person's confidence in himself and his judgment.

TACTIC 6. Create strong aversive emotional arousals in the subject by use of nonphysical punishments such as intense humiliation, loss of privilege, social isolation, social status changes, intense guilt, anxiety, manipulation and other techniques.

TACTIC 7. Intimidate the person with the force of group-sanctioned secular psychological threats. For example, it may be suggested or implied that failure to adopt the approved attitude, belief, or consequent behavior will lead to severe punishment or dire consequences such as physical or mental illness, the reappearance of a prior physical illness, drug dependence, economic collapse, social failure, divorce, disintegration, failure to find a mate, etc.

These tactics of psychological force are applied to such a severe degree that the individual's capacity to make informed or free choices becomes inhibited. The victims become unable to make the normal, wise or balanced decisions which they most likely or normally would have made, had they not been unknowingly manipulated by these coordinated technical processes. The cumulative effect of these processes can be an even more effective form of undue influence than pain, torture, drugs or the use of physical force and physical and legal threats.


Informant: Mark Marks

Ladies and Gentlemen

We, the undersigned organisations and individuals, urge you to pay attention to our following argumentation.

While there exists a massive indirect evidence that technical means enabling remote control of human nervous system are available to many modern governments and the ban of the use of such means is a matter of international negotiations (as you can see from attached documents), there is no direct evidence of the existence of the means enabling remote control of human nervous system which would allow the mass media and world general public to get engaged in the ban of the use of such means. However we are presenting you, in the attachments, evidence that those means are subject to National Security Information laws at least in the United States of America and the Russian Federation. Evidently such situation creates opportunity for any government which owns such means to use it against individuals without giving them any chance of legal defense. In this way the concept of democracy and the prospect of the democratic world is becoming corrupt. We are aware that many individuals adressed your organisation with requests for help which you have denied to them claiming that the sole affaire you are concerned with, according to your statutes, are prisoners of conscience. Let us quote from the book of the first in history promoter of abuse of human rights based on the manipulation of human nervous system:

"In the past the individual could face risks and pressures with preservation of his own identity. His body could be tortured, his thoughts and desires could be challenged by bribes, by emotions, and by public opinion, and his behavior could be influenced by environmental circumstances, but he allways had the privilige of deciding his own fate, of dying for an ideal without changing his mind…New neurological technology, however, has a refined efficiency. The individual is defenseless against dicrect manipulation of the brain…" (Jose Delgado, 1969, neurophysiologist at the Yale University, from the book "Physical Control of the Mind, Toward a Psychocivilized Society").

Could you not understand from this text that perhaps the statutes of your organisation are not up to date with the technological advances of this world?

All the same we read in the statutes of your organisation that "Amnesty International's mission is to undertake research and action focused on preventing and ending grave abuses of the rights to physical and mental integrity, freedom of conscience and expression, and freedom from discrimination…" Many of the undersigned consider themselves to be exposed to this kind of human rights abuses, though they have no technical means available to be able to prove it.

As well we read in your statutes that the "functions of the International Executive Committee are to take international decisions on behalf of AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL…to make any necessary adjustments to the Integrated Strategic Plan and other decisions of the International Council…" and "to ensure compliance with the Statute".

Therefore we strongly believe that, according to your statutes, your organisation is capable to defend human rights even in the changing modern world. We are aware that having no evidence you can not take direct action on anyone's behalf (unless you get engaged in the research of methods of detecting the signals used for the remote manipulation of human brain). Attached we are mailing you the article suggesting that those technologies were used by Israelis against Palestinians. Perhaps your organisation could find among Palestinians people who would testify about the use of means of remote manipulation of human nervous system against them.

Even if you do not succeed in finding such Palestinians, we are aware that your simple decision, in capacity of the only respectable organisation defending human rights in the world, to pay attention to this kind of human rights abuse would create in the world a new situation which could potentially lead even to the creation of an Amnesty International's structure or special section engaged in this kind of research and guaranteeing human rights against their possible abuse by technological means or to the formation of similar structures within the government structures around the world (available to foreigners).

That such an action is urgent we conclude from our own research into the growing numbers of people claiming that they have become victims of mind control manipulations particularly in the United States of America (with the population of 293 millions of inhabitants) and Japan. According to our counting only in the past ten months the number of Americans claiming that their minds, feelings and bodily functions are being manipulated (on three English-speaking internet lists) grew by 219, from 494 to 713. In Japan, with the population of 127 millions the number of such people, during the same period of time grew by 66, from 134 to 200 (the counting was performed by Japanese organisation representing those people). If you wish, we can prove to you those numbers.This growth should be perceived, in our understanding, as a threat to world democracy.

In the United States in October 2000 was introduced a bill proposing, among others, the ban of deployment of "mind control" weapons in the space (see the attachment). The bill did not pass. If such weapons are deployed in the space they can be used for the manipulation of nervous functions of whole populations and this would definitively mean an unprecedented, massive, human rights abuse.

Let us add that in underdeveloped countries of the world the numbers of people complaining that the functioning of their nervous system is being remotely manipulated are negligible or none, compared to the Russian Federation and USA, which are best known for their mind control research, (as you can see from the attached statistics) - most probably in each of those two countries there are over 2000 people making such complaints.

We would greatly appreciate if you mentioned this problem in any of your published documents and possibly started working toward the creation of a special structure dedicated to the defense of human rights in this area.

As well we will greatly appreciate your qualified reply to this our petition.

International Movement for the Ban of Manipulation of Human Nervous System by Technical Means ( mbabacek@iol.cz )

Mojmir Babacek ( mbabacek@iol.cz )

(other names and titles of organisations together with their e-mail addresses)

Attachments:

Copy of the Conclusion and Resolution of the Russian State Duma number 28/3 of November 30, 2000 (together with English translation)

Resolution of the European Parliament of January 1999 (in paragraph 27 it calls for an international ban on all research, developments and deployments of weapons enabling any form of manipulation of human beings)

A book by the Russian politician Vladimir Lopatin "Psychotronic War" (in Russian together with English translation of some parts of it)

Documents proving that mind control technology is subject to the National Security Information law in the USA (response to FOIA request by Margo Cherney and response to a letter by Eleanor White to the deputy of the New York Assembly)

Printed page of Denis J. Kucinich's bill proposing the ban of space based weapons

Collection of copies of Russian newspaper's articles on the subject of mind control technology, its probable use and the fact that it is classified in the Russian Federation and the article in the newspaper "Segodnya" descibing a Russian initiative to enact a global ban of the use of mind control technology (with an article recently published in the New Dawn magazine and using the English quotations from those articles)

Copies of U.S. military publications (open to the public) proving that mind control technology is being developed and probably produced in the USA

Copy of the article in the American Defense News magazine where an Israeli general claims that mind control technology was tested on Palestinians