PROJECT SLAMMER: Microwave Harassment and Mind-Control Experimentation
"PROJECT SLAMMER"
Microwave Harassment and Mind-Control Experimentation
http://www.subgenius.com/bigfist/answers/articles/X0038_Microwave_Harassment.html
From: Howard Duck
via: William Gazecki
Refusal and/or inability of local police to intervene.
The tendency of local Police is to dismiss an individual's complaints of government harassment as the ravings of a "fruitcake." In one case, discussed above, it is apparent that one police officer is actively cooperating in the harassment. Some police agencies, while acknowledging the reality of the situation, hesitate to intervene in cases involving what they believe to be U.S. Intelligence. On a few occasions, certain police officials did attempt to intervene, based on what they perceived to be evidence of a systematic harassment/illegal surveillance campaign. Absent a clear mandate to prosecute "stalkers" acting under the aegis of U.S. Intelligence, the police obviously have their hands tied.
Refusal of the FBI to intervene in any of the cases brought to our attention, thus far.
FBI spokesmen do acknowledge that they have received a large number of requests for assistance from mentally disturbed persons who believe that they are being "zapped by radio waves" and/or "are hearing voices"..."from Mars, that is.'"
In one case, an FBI spokesman reacted in an angry, defensive and bizarre fashion when our contact briefly alluded to PROJECT SLAMMER as possibly being related to her surveillance. (PROJECT SLAMMER is a CIA- funded study, managed by CIA and FBI behavioral scientists, which explores the "mental make-up" of alleged security risks, along with their family members and close associates. Participants in PROJECT SLAMMER include NSA, DIA, and Army, Navy and Air Force Intelligence.)
Until PROJECT SLAMMER was mentioned, the FBI spokesman's approach in this case was to politely and redundantly explain that the law, as currently constructed, prevents the FBI's intervening in this individual's case. When she briefly pointed out that the surveillance activities might fall under the purview of PROJECT SLAMMER, the spokesman's response was to abruptly and angrily declaim, "You don't know who is conducting that surveillance! You don't know if that is a state police surveillance!...or a local police surveillance! It could be a totally unrelated operation! You don't know who is conducting that surveillance! [etc., etc.]!"
It was apparent from this response that the FBI was at least acknowledging the existence of a surveillance, if in somewhat emotional fashion. The individual in question subsequently furnished acquired evidence to the local police, who made it clear that they are not participants in the surveillance which, based on the evidence, pointedly suggests that our contact is the target.
Refusal or inability or the ACLU and Amnesty International to intervene.
Both organizations acknowledge receiving many complaints from persons claiming to be the targets of some type of electronic harassment. An ACLU spokeswoman characterized the complainants as appearing to be rational, except in a few cases. The complaints are not being investigated, she said, because of "limited resources." We have to wonder, of course, why the ACLU could recently find resources to defend the rights of prostitutes and the Ku Klux Klan, yet remains incapable of intervening in cases such as we are now pursuing.
Amnesty International recently informed one of our contacts that they could not intervene in her case because their focus is on the U.S. Government's treatment of prison inmates. While incarceration does appear to be one sought for objective in these harassment/mind- control experiments, we would like to think that protections by such organizations as Amnesty International can be achieved beforehand.
WOW
MUCH MUCH MORE AT WEB LINK ABOVE
Gerry Duffett
http://www.goliathboards.com/users5/gerryduffett/index.cgi
http://mindcontrol.twoday.net/search?q=Microwave+Mind+Control
Microwave Harassment and Mind-Control Experimentation
http://www.subgenius.com/bigfist/answers/articles/X0038_Microwave_Harassment.html
From: Howard Duck
via: William Gazecki
Refusal and/or inability of local police to intervene.
The tendency of local Police is to dismiss an individual's complaints of government harassment as the ravings of a "fruitcake." In one case, discussed above, it is apparent that one police officer is actively cooperating in the harassment. Some police agencies, while acknowledging the reality of the situation, hesitate to intervene in cases involving what they believe to be U.S. Intelligence. On a few occasions, certain police officials did attempt to intervene, based on what they perceived to be evidence of a systematic harassment/illegal surveillance campaign. Absent a clear mandate to prosecute "stalkers" acting under the aegis of U.S. Intelligence, the police obviously have their hands tied.
Refusal of the FBI to intervene in any of the cases brought to our attention, thus far.
FBI spokesmen do acknowledge that they have received a large number of requests for assistance from mentally disturbed persons who believe that they are being "zapped by radio waves" and/or "are hearing voices"..."from Mars, that is.'"
In one case, an FBI spokesman reacted in an angry, defensive and bizarre fashion when our contact briefly alluded to PROJECT SLAMMER as possibly being related to her surveillance. (PROJECT SLAMMER is a CIA- funded study, managed by CIA and FBI behavioral scientists, which explores the "mental make-up" of alleged security risks, along with their family members and close associates. Participants in PROJECT SLAMMER include NSA, DIA, and Army, Navy and Air Force Intelligence.)
Until PROJECT SLAMMER was mentioned, the FBI spokesman's approach in this case was to politely and redundantly explain that the law, as currently constructed, prevents the FBI's intervening in this individual's case. When she briefly pointed out that the surveillance activities might fall under the purview of PROJECT SLAMMER, the spokesman's response was to abruptly and angrily declaim, "You don't know who is conducting that surveillance! You don't know if that is a state police surveillance!...or a local police surveillance! It could be a totally unrelated operation! You don't know who is conducting that surveillance! [etc., etc.]!"
It was apparent from this response that the FBI was at least acknowledging the existence of a surveillance, if in somewhat emotional fashion. The individual in question subsequently furnished acquired evidence to the local police, who made it clear that they are not participants in the surveillance which, based on the evidence, pointedly suggests that our contact is the target.
Refusal or inability or the ACLU and Amnesty International to intervene.
Both organizations acknowledge receiving many complaints from persons claiming to be the targets of some type of electronic harassment. An ACLU spokeswoman characterized the complainants as appearing to be rational, except in a few cases. The complaints are not being investigated, she said, because of "limited resources." We have to wonder, of course, why the ACLU could recently find resources to defend the rights of prostitutes and the Ku Klux Klan, yet remains incapable of intervening in cases such as we are now pursuing.
Amnesty International recently informed one of our contacts that they could not intervene in her case because their focus is on the U.S. Government's treatment of prison inmates. While incarceration does appear to be one sought for objective in these harassment/mind- control experiments, we would like to think that protections by such organizations as Amnesty International can be achieved beforehand.
WOW
MUCH MUCH MORE AT WEB LINK ABOVE
Gerry Duffett
http://www.goliathboards.com/users5/gerryduffett/index.cgi
http://mindcontrol.twoday.net/search?q=Microwave+Mind+Control
Omega - 7. Aug, 15:35
