Is an Armament Sickening U.S. Soldiers?

AOL's opening page


Is an Armament Sickening U.S. Soldiers? - AOL News

Talk about it at AOL message board:

AOL Message Boards -- Is an Armament Sickening U.S. Soldiers?

Bureaucracy of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Depleted Uranium (DU)

Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington DC.

("We all had migraines. We all feel sick," Reed says. "The doctors said, 'It's all in your head."'

The veterans, using their positive results as evidence, have sued the U.S. Army . . . .

The Department of Defense says depleted uranium is powerful and safe, and not that worrisome.

Those results were negative, Reed said. "Their test just isn't sophisticated," he said. "And when we first asked to be tested, they told us there wasn't one. They've lied to us all along."

The Department of Defense takes the position that you can eat it (DU) for breakfast and it poses no threat at all," said Steve Robinson of the National Gulf War Resource Center, which helps veterans with serious problems . . . .")

It might be a good thing for us targets to throw our support behind these veterans. This might be one avenue for piggy-backing government based mind control into the courtroom and the legal system.

I think that we should contact these veterans and see how we can help their cause, and perhaps our own.

It might be a good idea for us targets to make ourselves known on this particular message board.

Bob D.

The Veterans Administration, (the VA), they know what is going on.

Using the Delphi Technique to Achieve Consensus

Censored message: The "Delphi Technique" used by US Congressman Posted from the web page to avoid Capcha Censorship; which is installed of the Main Yahoo mail server


If you recently attended the meeting held by Congressman Joe Wilson, on illegal immigration, or if you plan to attend other such meetings, you will benefit from a study of The "Delphi Technique".

Attendees were told to write their questions on a card and pass them to the front. The "facilitator" could be SEEN shuffling through the cards,


Anyone who spoke was silenced with the admonition to "write their questions on a card and pass them to the front."

Most of those silenced, in this manner, had ALREADY written their questions on a card and passed them to the front, but were frustrated THAT THE QUESTIONS WERE IGNORED.



Using the Delphi Technique to Achieve Consensus

How it is leading us away from representative government to an illusion of citizen participation.

The Delphi Technique and consensus building are both founded in the same principle - the Hegelian dialectic of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis, with synthesis becoming the new thesis. The goal is a continual evolution to "oneness of mind" (consensus means solidarity of belief) -the collective mind, the wholistic society, the wholistic earth, etc. In thesis and antithesis, opinions or views are presented on a subject to establish views and opposing views. In synthesis, opposites are brought together to form the new thesis. All participants in the process are then to accept ownership of the new thesis and support it, changing their views to align with the new thesis. Through a continual process of evolution, "oneness of mind" will supposedly occur. In group settings, the Delphi Technique is an unethical method of achieving consensus on controversial topics. It requires well- trained professionals, known as "facilitators" or "change agents," who deliberately escalate tension among group members, pitting one faction against another to make a preordained viewpoint appear "sensible," while making opposing views appear ridiculous.

In her book Educating for the New World Order, author and educator Beverly Eakman makes numerous references to the need of those in power to preserve the illusion that there is "community participation in decision-making processes, while in fact lay citizens are being squeezed out."

The setting or type of group is immaterial for the success of the technique. The point is that, when people are in groups that tend to share a particular knowledge base, they display certain identifiable characteristics, known as group dynamics, which allows the facilitator to apply the basic strategy.

The facilitators or change agents encourage each person in a group to express concerns about the programs, projects, or policies in question. They listen attentively, elicit input from group members, form "task forces," urge participants to make lists, and in going through these motions, learn about each member of a group. They are trained to identify the "leaders," the "loud mouths," the "weak or non-committal members," and those who are apt to change sides frequently during an argument.

Suddenly, the amiable facilitators become professional agitators and "devil's advocates." Using the "divide and conquer" principle, they manipulate one opinion against another, making those who are out of step appear "ridiculous, unknowledgeable, inarticulate, or dogmatic." They attempt to anger certain participants, thereby accelerating tensions. The facilitators are well trained in psychological manipulation. They are able to predict the reactions of each member in a group. Individuals in opposition to the desired policy or program will be shut out.

The Delphi Technique works. It is very effective with parents, teachers, school children, and community groups. The "targets" rarely, if ever, realize that they are being manipulated. If they do suspect what is happening, they do not know how to end the process. The facilitator seeks to polarize the group in order to become an accepted member of the group and of the process. The desired idea is then placed on the table and individual opinions are sought during discussion. Soon, associates from the divided group begin to adopt the idea as if it were their own, and they pressure the entire group to accept their proposition.

How the Delphi Technique Works

Consistent use of this technique to control public participation in our political system is causing alarm among people who cherish the form of government established by our Founding Fathers. Efforts in education and other areas have brought the emerging picture into focus.

In the not-too-distant past, the city of Spokane, in Washington state, hired a consultant to the tune of $47,000 to facilitate the direction of city government. This development brought a hue and cry from the local population. The ensuing course of action holds an eerie similarity to what is happening in education reform. A newspaper editorial described how groups of disenfranchised citizens were brought together to "discuss" what they felt needed to be changed at the local government level. A compilation of the outcomes of those "discussions" influenced the writing of the city/county charter.

That sounds innocuous. But what actually happened in Spokane is happening in communities and school districts all across the country. Let's review the process that occurs in these meetings.

First, a facilitator is hired. While his job is supposedly neutral and non-judgmental, the opposite is actually true. The facilitator is there to direct the meeting to a preset conclusion.

The facilitator begins by working the crowd to establish a good-guy- bad-guy scenario. Anyone disagreeing with the facilitator must be made to appear as the bad guy, with the facilitator appearing as the good guy. To accomplish this, the facilitator seeks out those who disagree and makes them look foolish, inept, or aggressive, which sends a clear message to the rest of the audience that, if they don't want the same treatment, they must keep quiet. When the opposition has been identified and alienated, the facilitator becomes the good guy - a friend - and the agenda and direction of the meeting are established without the audience ever realizing what has happened.

Next, the attendees are broken up into smaller groups of seven or eight people. Each group has its own facilitator. The group facilitators steer participants to discuss preset issues, employing the same tactics as the lead facilitator.

Participants are encouraged to put their ideas and disagreements on paper, with the results to be compiled later. Who does the compiling? If you ask participants, you typically hear: "Those running the meeting compiled the results." Oh-h! The next question is: "How do you know that what you wrote on your sheet of paper was incorporated into the final outcome?" The typical answer is: "Well, I've wondered about that, because what I wrote doesn't seem to be reflected. I guess my views were in the minority."

That is the crux of the situation. If 50 people write down their ideas individually, to be compiled later into a final outcome, no one knows what anyone else has written. That the final outcome of such a meeting reflects anyone's input at all is highly questionable, and the same holds true when the facilitator records the group's comments on paper. But participants in these types of meetings usually don't question the process.

Why hold such meetings at all if the outcomes are already established? The answer is because it is imperative for the acceptance of the School-to-Work agenda, or the environmental agenda, or whatever the agenda, that ordinary people assume ownership of the preset outcomes. If people believe an idea is theirs, they'll support it. If they believe an idea is being forced on them, they'll resist.

The Delphi Technique is being used very effectively to change our government from a representative form in which elected individuals represent the people, to a "participatory democracy" in which citizens selected at large are facilitated into ownership of preset outcomes. These citizens believe that their input is important to the result, whereas the reality is that the outcome was already established by people not apparent to the participants.

How to Diffuse the Delphi Technique

Three steps can diffuse the Delphi Technique as facilitators attempt to steer a meeting in a specific direction.

Always be charming, courteous, and pleasant. Smile. Moderate your voice so as not to come across as belligerent or aggressive.

Stay focused. If possible, jot down your thoughts or questions. When facilitators are asked questions they don't want to answer, they often digress from the issue that was raised and try instead to put the questioner on the defensive. Do not fall for this tactic. Courteously bring the facilitator back to your original question. If he rephrases it so that it becomes an accusatory statement (a popular tactic), simply say, "That is not what I asked. What I asked was . . ." and repeat your question.

Be persistent. If putting you on the defensive doesn't work, facilitators often resort to long monologues that drag on for several minutes. During that time, the group usually forgets the question that was asked, which is the intent. Let the facilitator finish. Then with polite persistence state: "But you didn't answer my question. My question was . . ." and repeat your question. Never become angry under any circumstances. Anger directed at the facilitator will immediately make the facilitator the victim. This defeats the purpose. The goal of facilitators is to make the majority of the group members like them, and to alienate anyone who might pose a threat to the realization of their agenda. People with firm, fixed beliefs, who are not afraid to stand up for what they believe in, are obvious threats. If a participant becomes a victim, the facilitator loses face and favor with the crowd. This is why crowds are broken up into groups of seven or eight, and why objections are written on paper rather than voiced aloud where they can be open to public discussion and debate. It's called crowd control.

At a meeting, have two or three people who know the Delphi Technique dispersed through the crowd so that, when the facilitator digresses from a question, they can stand up and politely say: "But you didn't answer that lady/gentleman's question." Even if the facilitator suspects certain group members are working together, he will not want to alienate the crowd by making accusations. Occasionally, it takes only one incident of this type for the crowd to figure out what's going on.

Establish a plan of action before a meeting. Everyone on your team should know his part. Later, analyze what went right, what went wrong and why, and what needs to happen the next time. Never strategize during a meeting.

A popular tactic of facilitators, if a session is meeting with resistance, is to call a recess. During the recess, the facilitator and his spotters (people who observe the crowd during the course of a meeting) watch the crowd to see who congregates where, especially those who have offered resistance. If the resistors congregate in one place, a spotter will gravitate to that group and join in the conversation, reporting what was said to the facilitator. When the meeting resumes, the facilitator will steer clear of the resistors. Do not congregate. Instead gravitate to where the facilitators or spotters are. Stay away from your team members.

This strategy also works in a face-to-face, one-on-one meeting with anyone trained to use the Delphi Technique.

Lynn Stuter is an education researcher in Washington state. Her web site address is http://www.learn-usa.com/.


Informant: savefreedom2005


The "Delphi Technique" used by US Congressman

Controlling the Human Mind: The Technologies of Political Control or Tools for Peak Performance

Victims of this technolgy of barbarians should make a concerted effort to contact this legitimate author for possible direction for help.

His website is earthpulse.com

Controlling the Human Mind: The Technologies of Political Control or Tools for Peak Performance

Author: Dr. Nick Begich

Look Inside

The Technologies of Political Control or Tools for Peak Performance
ISBN 1-890693-54-5

This is the Century of the brain and the mind. The technologies that have advanced, under cover of secrecy and national security, now have the power to either enslave us or free us to our higher potentials. These technologies will impact our consciousness itself and as a result require an invigorated public debate, in the light of day. At the same time, there is hope and great possibility in these areas of science. The first part of this book deals with the sinister side of Controlling the Human Mind with the second part exploring the possibilities that are emerging with new brain and mind enhancing technologies. The greatest threats and the greatest possibilities reside within the core of who we are and what happens in the center of our minds, the seat of our souls. This is the most important book yet released from the research efforts of Dr. Nick Begich

"The best deterrent that we have against acts of terrorism is to find out who is conspiring, who has the material, where they are getting it, who they are talking to, and what are their plans. In order to do that, in order to interdict the terrorists before they set off their weapon, you have to have that kind of intelligence- gathering capability, but it runs smack into our constitutional protections of privacy. And it's a tension which will continue to exist in every free society - the reconciliation of the need for liberty and the need for law and order....that once these weapons start to be exploded people will say, "Protect us. We're willing to give up some of our liberties and some of our freedoms, but you must protect us." And that is what will lead us into this 21st century, this kind of Constitutional tension of how much protection can we provide and still preserve essential liberties."

Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, Defense Viewpoint, December 1, 1998

"One can envision the development of electromagnetic energy sources, the output of which can be pulsed, shaped, and focused, that can couple with the human body in a fashion that will allow one to prevent voluntary muscular movements, control emotions (and thus actions), produce sleep, transmit suggestions, interfere with both short-term and long-term memory, produce an experience set, and delete an experience set. It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction...Thus, it may be possible to 'talk' to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them."

United States Air Force
Scientific Advisory Board, New World Vistas: Air and Space Power For The 21st Century


A young girl was terribly tortured and harassed by their weapons

I heard this story from other people.

(The reason that such a sad and love story could happen because there were a group people who had been torturing and harassing citizens using their high and advanced technologies, such as mind control and Directed Energy Weapons and they did not be caught and stopped according to law.)

A young girl was terribly tortured and harassed by their weapons and she was almost dying. A young boy who was employed by torturers saw the girl¡'s terrible suffering. He never tortured and harassed anyone yet, and he tried but would not able to stop torturers. The young boy took a very acute action. He kidnapped and raped that girl and asked the girl to go to police office. The boy thought, if he was caught by police and he would able to drop out of torturers organization. And the jail was a safer place for him and he also wished the police would find those torturers through him. But unfortunately, the girl did not want the boy go to jail, she did not report to the police. As a result, the boy died unknown; and the girl also died unknown.

Mind Control Devices Have Gone NANO

I believe Nano encapsulated passive transceivers/transponders gps based which allows the use of directed energy delivery. The entire field around the victim becomes the play ground for abuse and exploitation. Piggy back microwave pulsed energy begins to interefere with all forms of communication ie. telephone, electrical equipment i.e. car computer or battery or electrical circuits of your home or anything.

The nano devices pass the blood-brain-barrier, a phospholipid bilayer and form a matrix-like sheet floating in cerebral spinal fluid to function at mulptiple brain-mapp sites.

The device couples to the optive nerve and may just re-create some crude visual field of the victim remotely on their neural network based program interpreter.

A complete computer brain interface.

The only problem is detecting such a miniaturized self assembling groups of nano devices with limited modern radiological technology.



Nano technology in the brain and/or nervous system may be one means for creating many of the affects that we targets perceive as perp effects. However, that is just one phase of what the perps are able to accomplish. Nanotechnology cannot, in and of itself, address the full range of perp effects, such as activating mechanical devices remotely. Devices that are not even visually accessible. It does not explain how the perps can weaken or completely destroy "select" pieces of electronic detection or recording equipment, and do it remotely and in real-time. There are many other external perp effects that cannot be explained in terms of nanotechnology inside the body of a target.

For example, a couple of weeks ago, the finger on my left-hand, the one right next to the little finger, it suddenly became stiff, turned blue and purple and swelled up. I lost feeling in that one finger near completely. I took a hand-magnifying lens and carefully searched the finger over for any kind of bite marks, I found nothing. There was no logical reason for that finger to suddenly behave in this fashion. The finger swelled up to nearly 1/2 times again larger than the same finger on the other hand. It got so bad that I considered going to the emergence room for treatment. It was exactly as if someone had tied a strange string around the base of that finger and twisted the string until the blood circulation was completely cutoff. I kept rubbing this finger and putting it in cold water. After a couple of days, the swelling went away and in about 4 days, it was back to normal. It had gotten so bad that I feared that I would lose that finger. It is my belief that it was perp technology doing this to me. There was no logical reason for that one finger to act up in that fashion, and the other four fingers and hand were fine. I believe that the perps were just letting me know that if they really wanted to, they could cause me a hell of a lot of grief, mess me up big-time.

I can point out a half-dozen or more external perp effects that cannot possibly be accounted for as the manipulation of our perception by nanotechnology in our brains and/or nervous system. It is my firm conviction that we will never determine the true nature of perp technology until we first catalog the full range and scope of their effects and abilities, both internal and external.

Bob D.


In his book, Christof Koch, chapter 8, page 138, he writes:

("In colored-hearing, certain words, sounds, or music consistently evoke particular colors. As in other forms of synesthesia, color-hearing is automatic, involuntary, and stable across many years. Celebrated famously in Aldous Huxley's Doors of Perception, it is a condition that some individuals are fortunate enough to enjoy throughout life without the use of any drugs. Hue percepts evoked by words trigger brain activity in the same part of the fusiform gyrus of synesthetes as color stimuli. . . . .")


Perhaps those perp words and projected sounds that we hear are addressing more regions of our brains than just the auditory area.

Bob D.


In his book, The QUEST for CONSCIOUSNESS: A Neurobiological Approach

by Christof Koch

and Forward by Francis Crick

ISBN: 0-9747077-0-8


page 140


("What happens if MT (brain's middle temporal area) is destroyed? . . . . L.M., a neurological patient, strikingly demonstrates the highly particular nature of perceptual deficits that can be observed. She lost MT and other, nearby regions on both sides of her brain to a vascular disorder. This rare occurrence causes a devastating motion blindness or, to use Zeki's term, akinetopsia. According to the original report.

She had difficulty, for example, in pouring tea or coffee into a cup because the fluid appeared to be frozen, like a glacier. In addition, she could not stop pouring at the right time since she was unable to perceive the movement in the cup (or a pot) when the fluid rose. . . . . In a room where more than two other people were walking she felt insecure and unwell, and usually left the room immediately, because "people were suddenly here and or there but I have not seen them moving." . . . . She could not cross the street because of her inability to judge the speed of a car, but she could identify the car itself without difficulty. . . . .

L.M. could infer that objects moved by comparing their relative position in time, but she never saw motion. Nevertheless, she has normal color and form perception, spatial acuity, and can detect flickering lights. It was as if she lived in a world illuminated by a stroboscopic lamp, not unlike a disco . . . or like watching a greatly slowed-down movie, in which the individual frames are visible . . . .")

Bob D.


FloridaState TIMES


2000 April/May




("Everybody's brain is different, like a fingerprint," Hurdal said, "The fissures of the brain vary greatly from person to person, and we think this method will allow scientists to make comparisons that will hopefully lead to greater understanding of how the brain works. . . . ."

. . . . "It's a mathematically sound method to create maps that will allow comparison of brain activity. . . . . These maps are unique to each person."

Informant: dunl254


Could this be one component of the system the perps use to track and isolate us for targeting?

Bob D.


BYTE-by-BYTE, a MAP of the BRAIN

by Robert Lee Hotz


Arthur W. Toga is feeding the human brain to the Reality Monster, one digital slice at a time.

("This thing devouring the brain in bytes is a graphics Onyx2 Reality Monster, which is designed to handle unusually large three-dimensional visual displays of information.

In its automatic carousels of 80-gigabyte storage drives, the computer cradles the digital essence of the most complex object . . . the human brain. In fact, it holds detailed anatomical data files on more than 2000 human brains, with data on 3000 more waiting to be added. The data set for just one of these brains is the electronic equivalent of a million books. By the end of the year, Toga at UCLA's Laboratory of Neuro Imaging and Dr. John Mazziotta, director of UCLA's brain mapping division, expects to have 7000 brains from seven countries scanned into this electronic organ bank.")


I wonder if any target's brains are part of this data bank? I also wonder if the Veteran Administration is involved?

Bob D.

Mind Control


Users Status

You are not logged in.


Mind Control





August 2006

Recent Updates

BKA und andere Polizeidiensstellen
Minister Schily, Innenministerium und BKA: http://www.findefux.d e/forum/read.php4?f=84&i=5 04&t=497 -------- Ruth.. .
Omega - 12. Mar, 22:44
Parlamentarische Kontrollkommission
Bundestagsdrucksache 14/8464 http://tinyurl.com /67sud -------- Schreibe n...
Omega - 12. Mar, 22:42
Plötzlich bricht das...
„Polizei aktuell: Plötzlich bricht das Auto aus“ Ksl....
Omega - 12. Mar, 22:41
Rechtsstaat Deutschland...
An alle Betroffenen, anbei ein Schreiben zur Information...
Omega - 12. Mar, 22:39
An alle Menschen, die...
An alle Menschen, die guten Willens sind und denen...
Omega - 12. Mar, 22:38


Online for 7355 days
Last update: 12. Mar, 22:44


Weltherrschaft - NWO - New World Order - Verschwoerungstheorien
Aktionen - Actions
Beitraege von John Mecca
Beitraege von Alan Van Arsdale
Beitraege von Anna Fubini
Beitraege von anonymous
Beitraege von Axel Brueggemann
Beitraege von Bob Rose
Beitraege von Bob S
Beitraege von Brigitte Althof
Beitraege von Carla
Beitraege von Clare Louise Wehrle
Beitraege von Claus-Peter Gerber
Beitraege von Corey
... more
Subscribe Weblog